rediff ILAND
Welcome Guest, | Create your own iLand| Sign In  | New User? Get Started
Home
iLand
Blogs
Friends/Contributors
Guestbook  
 
Krishna
Padmanabhan

Categories
Blogs
Politics
Poetry
Astrology
What is an RSS feed?
RSS Feed 
InsatiableIndian.rediffiland.com/ 
Recent Posts
 13:44 | 5/May/2008 | 5 Comment(s)
No Woman No Cry

 


I am letting you into no secret when I say that that this world suffers from several forms of deprivation. But the deprivation of the mind that causes suffering to women is among the worst.

 

I have been troubled by two incidents that I read over the last few weeks. One of them is about the Nobel Laureate, V S Naipaul; the other about the alleged rapist father, Fritzl.

 

I will talk about Naipaul first. He is a writer who has my greatest admiration. His novel ‘A House for Mr Biswas’ remains one of the best books I have read. 


I have one thing about writers – they are not men and women without flaws; many of them are not examples of moral uprightness. For every morally steadfast Dr Johnson, there is a myriad Boswells, consorting with prostitutes, or a thousand Archers allegedly defrauding people. However, their ability and genius is in their trade, which is why they merit my attention and time. Therefore, I find it skewed reasoning when somebody tells me that he stopped reading Archer because the author went to prison for fraud. Some time back when I read about Sir Vidia’s candid admission that his mental cruelty for almost forty years towards his first wife Patricia Ann Hale might have contributed to her demise, I felt uncomfortable with his actions, but that did not diminish my admiration of his genius, or turn me away from his works. 


Recently, I read about Sir Vidia’s treatment of his Lady Patricia in greater detail, and I found myself less accommodating of this great writer. His cruelty and insensitivity are beyond the realms of moral turpitude that I refrian from judging writers by. Patricia Ann Hale, with a fine face and a loving heart, gave up everything, her family, her friends, to support and (eventually) marry a penniless West Indian in an era of extreme racial prejudice. She supported him financially when he was without work, and throughout her sad life remained his sounding board, and more, for his writing. In return, he humiliated her, he stopped her acting career, he even refused to give her a wedding ring. Three years into their marriage, he started visiting prostitutes for paid sex, while his wife worked to support him. Then he met an Argentinean, and openly carried on with an adulterous affair, even telling the long suffering Patricia that he missed his mistress.  


When cancer struck Patricia, and she had a mastectomy performed, his cruelty did not diminish. He still used her to help him with his writing, in a critical and clerical sort of way. Even knowing about his infidelity, she supported him, in an exhibition of female love that I can never comprehend. She had started recovering from cancer, when the writer publicly announced that he regularly visited prostitutes. This public humiliation affected her, and the cancer returned. Sir Vidia, at that time, was onto a new love in his life, a Pakistani. He apparently felt angry that Patricia was not dying quickly enough for him to get on with his life. He brought the Pakistani lady into his house the day after Pat’s funeral. He remarried within the next two months. 


The case of the alleged rapist Josef Fritzl has been splashed across the news media, in great and agonising detail. For those that do not know, Josef allegedly imprisoned his daughter Elisabeth in a windowless dungeon for twenty four years, and fathered seven children by her. One child died immediately after birth, three children were transported out of the dungeon to Josef’s home upstairs, and the other three lived with their mother in the dungeon. By a quirk of fate, the case came to light, and the mother and her children were released. Incest has been proven through DNA tests. Josef is in prison, awaiting trial, and the mother and her children are in psychiatric care.

 

Elisabeth’s mother apparently had not realised what was going on. Josef concocted a story of how his daughter Elisabeth had run away with a mysterious sect and was living with them. He got his captive daughter to write notes that said that that she was leaving her children at their door step for him to take care of. Josef even went on holidays to the east for weeks together, while his daughter and her children remained locked up in their windowless dungeon. It is a story of extreme cruelty and unimaginable deprivation.

 

What hurts me most, and makes me very angry, is the attitude of men like Naipaul and Fritzl to the women that are part of their family, women, who would care for these men, and who would love them with their whole heart. The woman, as compared to the man, is capable of positive emotions in a relationship at a scale that the male cannot even comprehend. As somebody (I think it was Harold Robbins) said: ‘Love is an incident in a man’s life, it is the whole history of a woman’s life.’  Fame, or power, or both go into the minds of men, and they think that because they are famous, or hold power over their near and dear ones, it is their inalienable right to torture the very women that love them, that supported them, that would give up their own happiness so that these men can be happier. How wrong they are!! Theirs is no inalienable right; theirs is a crime that they will have to answer for: either in this life, or beyond. There is still justice in this world and an unforgiving God in the next.

 

Why should women cry? Whether it is in Austria or in Afghanistan, London or Lebanon, can’t we stop women from crying? (This is not to say that there are no cruel women. I have seen horrifying examples of women’s cruelty to other women too; and that is equally repulsive).

 


When I was a teenager, I used to listen to a Boney M song: ‘No woman no cry!’ (I did not find the lyrics impressive, but for that one starting line.) Those of you that read this blog, my request to you is: let us do what we can, however small, however little, towards realising a world where the Boney M song becomes a reality.


 No Woman No Cry!


 


References:


 


The innumerable articles and news stories on both Naipaul and the Fritzls.

Permalink 
 14:21 | 17/Feb/2008 | 6 Comment(s)
Control Systems - Going Down the Memory Lane

Last week I saw my son's Control Systems book lying on the dining table. I picked it up and started running through it over a cup of coffee.

I was flooded with memories of several years before, when I studied Control Systems Engineering under Prof. MAL Thathachar and Prof I G Sarma at IISc. Equivalent systems, Laplace Transforms, PID controls, Stability Analysis, the Routh-Hurwitz criteria, Bode Plots, the most enjoyable Nyquist plot, Pole-zero compensation, Distributed Digital Control, State Variables - I lived through them all!!

Prof Thathachar's excellent classes drew me to Control Systems - a subject that is widely shunned in the undergraduate level in engineering. I took Prof Sarma's 200 level course as an elective pre-requisite to doing a project under him. His challenge was that I score an A in the course, or I would not be on his project. I did score an A, and went on to do a project under him.  But more than that, Prof Thathachar and Prof Sarma channelled me into a career in Process Automation.

There were two incidents that happened during my interactions with Prof Thathachar and Prof Sarma. I had consistently done well in the internal tests and assignments in the Control Systems course, and was all set to do well in the final examination to get an A. But as luck would have it, I fell sick on the day before the exam with fever. I went to the Institute clinic to consult my doctor. He was not in attendance that day, and I was directed to the doctor in attendance, a lady. When I explained my problem to her, and said that I had an important examination the next day, she behaved most illogically. She told me that she did not believe me, and since I normally consulted the other doctor, she would not issue a medical certificate!! Needless to say, I wrote the examination with the fever the next day, and missed the A and got only a B. Later I met Prof Thathachar, and he said he was surprised that I did not get an A. That was when I told him of my fever and the doctor's reaction. Then he asked me one question: 'Why did you not come to me then? I would have organised another date for your test. But it is too late now!'

The incident with Prof Sarma (sadly, he passed away, at a relatively young age, may his soul rest in peace), was equally gratifying, though my response to his suggestions rankles me even today. I was working at that time with a multinational in Madras. They had not been entirely honest in their recruitment process about my area of work, and I landed up with a job I was not happy with. I came to Bangalore to meet Prof Sarma to explain to him my predicament. He offered to help me get a job at a National Defence Laboratory, which would enable me to do a Ph.D with him at IISc. Like a fool, I turned him down, and I have lived to regret the decision!!

However, I spent some of the most satisfying years of my career designing and engineering control and instrumentation systems for power generating stations. It is in a way sad that I had to leave control & instrumentation and move into engineering management and project management to maintain a decent increase in my salary.

Which brings me to another important point. Why should Indian companies insist that to grow in their organisations, employees need to move away from engineering and go to management? There needs to be a national debate on this. If anyone with any opportunity to do something about this should chance to read this blog, I would beseech him or her: Please do what you can to keep engineers doing what they like doing - engineering.

 

Permalink 
 04:56 | 11/Feb/2008 | 6 Comment(s)
Two Questions on Vedic Astrology

Like many people, I started off as a fanatical believer in God, and then became an atheist, an agnostic, and then a believer, but no longer fanatic. Somewhere in these phases, I was convinced that astrology was fallacy. However, I decided to learn astrology to prove to myself that astrology was just a lot of hot air.


 


The rest is history in that facet of my life. As I learned the fundamentals of vedic astrology, I was astounded by the depth and accuracy of the calculation methods used in vedic astrology. For those of you who may be interested, the planetary positions calculated by means of vedic calculations differ from those by modern astronomical calculations by only a fraction of a degree at the most. As I went in more into the effects of planets, the significance of houses, planetary aspects, and the infinite permutations made by planetary positions in each horoscope, I became like the non-believer in The Deserted Village – I came to scoff, but remained to pray.


 


Many people are vociferous in their assertion that astrology is without basis. I would urge them to learn the subject before expressing their scepticism. If somebody were to speak about relativistic mechanics based on a knowledge of the principles of Newtonian mechanics, he or she would easily find relativity to be a load of nonsense. However, somebody who has learned relativity would comprehend the truth behind the theory, but might still have doubts about some aspects of the theory. This is true of any scientific theory, and such doubting is healthy and the very essence of progressive thinking. But to dismiss a theory or branch of knowledge without studying is, in my opinion, tantamount to scientific sacrilege.


 


Among the several questions that people ask me on astrology (I wish to make it clear that I am no scholar on vedic astrology, though I have an innate interest in the subject, as well as some favourable support in my horoscope to astrological inclination) are two important ones:


 


1.       By looking at the position of nine planets, are we not categorising the entire human existence into a fixed set of circumstances? Those born under a particular sun sign will have their days and years similar to one another - In which case, is it not wrong?


2.       How does one justify the jump from the mathematical principles of Astronomy to the intuitive predictions of Astrology?


 


My answer to the first question is along the following lines: If we are categorising human existence based on the 12 signs and 9 planets, then we land up with a very limited set of permutations. Obviously, the plethora of human conditions is far beyond this limited set of permutations. If we extend our understanding to include the fact that each sign (or house) is of a 30 degree span, then we will be able to identify a significantly larger quantum of permutations based on the exact position occupied by each of the planets in each of the signs (or houses).  If we further consider the rising sign at the time of birth (Lagna), this increases the permutations even more. The rising sign is impacted by the date, place and time of birth. Then, as we move into the divisional charts, the possibilities start becoming boundless. Thus, two apparently similar basic charts would indicate substantially different patterns of fate and life, because several detailed features including divisional charts would be different. The native chart will also be impacted by the transit effects of planets. Therefore, under vedic astrology, the set of circumstances on the universal set of horoscopes in the world is neither fixed nor limited.


 


As far as the second question is concerned, I have to agree that there is a point at which the mathematical principles of astronomy have to give way to something less concrete. In predictive astrology, intuition plays a very important part. Thus a horoscope in the eyes of an intuitive astrologer will reveal more in a reading than the same horoscope when read by a less intuitive astrologer. However, exceptional trends can easily be seen by looking at the charts of eminent persons. Pancha maha purusha yogas fall in this category. For example, in the horoscope of a general, you are highly likely to find the Pancha maha purusha yoga caused by Mars – Ruchaka Yoga. Similarly, in the case of an eminent musician or a film star, Malaviya Yoga is highly likely. However, it is less easy to spot qualifications to these yogas present in a horoscope – for example, yoga bhangas, which destroy good yogas. Thus, if one is looking for a certain intuitive confirmation of astrological principles as a first step towards establishing a platform of reasonableness, one could look for pancha maha purusha yogas in eminent horoscopes. As a second step, one could look at the converse – of horoscopes of exceptional misfortune. Thus, gradually, by analysing more and more horoscopes, one could take the jump from mathematical astronomy (that helps us cast horoscopes) to intuitive astrology that helps us make predictions.


 


One thing is for sure, however. Astrology is not a science of absolutes, and is only a tool to predict trends. The difficulty in achieving the absolute correctness lies in the fact that there are innumerable factors affecting a horoscope at any particular point in time. It requires a certain greatness to achieve sustained and significant accuracy in predictions. Great minds have made such predictions – B V Raman (I am an Ekalavya disciple of his) is one among the greats.


 


Every theory or science or philosophical stream of thinking meets with scorn, disbelief and somtimes outright rejection from many quarters at the time it comes into existence.  Prof. Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar was driven to devastation when Eddington ridiculed his prediction of the existence of the upper limit (called the Chandrasekhar Limit) to the weight of a white dwarf. Neils Bohr and Wolfgang Pauli studied his theory and certified to its plausibility. (It took Chandrasekhar several years to restore the faith of the scientific community in his theory). Eddington was proved wrong. Prof Chandrasekhar went on to win the Nobel Prize (with W A Fowler) in Physics in 1983.  


 


When sceptics brush Astrology off their tables without a detailed study of the subject, in my opinion, they choose to act like Eddington. My request to such sceptics is: please do not jump to conclusions. Please give Astrology the same right to be studied and judged as much as other theories. Reject it if you should, but give it a hearing before you pass judgement. Remember, however, Astrology is not an accused in the court.

Permalink 
 15:03 | 3/Feb/2008 | 2 Comment(s)
O Captain, my Captain

In this world of conflict and chaos, it is only too easy to flow with the crowd, or be inactive. As we say in Electrical Engineering, take the path of least resistance. The world, however, brings in leaders from time to time, who sense what should be the correct path, use the force of their innate qualities and being, to overcome the resistance that comes with opposing the tide, so that those of us who are but ordinary may participate in an extraordinary future. Several names spring to mind - Gandhi, Dr Martin Luther King, Abraham Lincoln. They all fought against injustice.

 

Slavery is among the worst man-made evils. How man could be so cruel to fellow-man is beyond comprehension. Several years back, I read a book called Roots by Alex Haley. The book moved me very much indeed. Later I read other books on slavery, its origins and its history. In the early days of slavery, Africans sold fellow Africans as slaves to the white man. There is a section on slavery in the Field Museum at Chicago. On every one of my visits to that section, I was unable to control my tears.

 

Many years ago, I was in a long-drawn technical meeting with a gentleman from Canada and an Indian who was long settled in the USA. During a coffee/ cigarette break, we got to talking on areas outside the business. Somehow the conversation veered into the subject of the lives of black Americans. Both the Canadian and the Indian were not happy about the affirmative action policy in the United States. The Indian went so far as to accuse the black community in the USA of loose morals - 'they do not maintain families, you know', while the Canadian nodded in agreement. I was perturbed by their attitude, and their lack of appreciation of black suffering. I asked them both one question: 'Did the American state allow them to keep families during those horrendous centuries of slavery?' Needless to say that we never discussed blacks and slavery again.

 

I recount the incident with the Canadian and the Indian American here only to show how easy it is for people to fall into the trap of the path of least resistance. Abraham Lincoln, Gandhi and Martin Luther King could have gone along with the social conscience or the lack of it in their days, but being the great men they were, they chose otherwise.

 

It is a coincidence that all the three were assassinated. (Their assassins could take umbrage under the argument of avoiding the path of least resistance in opposing those the world wanted to follow, but such a direction would be perverse and destructive). We, who benefit from the vision and sacrifices of these great men, should be grateful that these great men graced the earth for at least as long as they did.  In the words of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow:

 

...Lives of great men all remind us
        We can make our lives sublime,
    And, departing, leave behind us
        Footprints on the sands of time;

    Footprints, that perhaps another,
        Sailing o'er life's solemn main,
    A forlorn and shipwrecked brother,
        Seeing, shall take heart again...

 

When Abraham Lincoln was assassinated, Walt Whitman, an American Poet wrote the following poem. Titled O Captain, my Captain! the poem is about a ship which returns to port with a Captain who is dead. The poem is an elegy and allegorical. The ship represents the American State, the Captain, as you would have guessed, is Abraham Lincoln, and the sailor who mourns the death of his Captain is symbolic of the American people.

 

O Captain! my Captain! our fearful trip is done;
The ship has weather’d every rack, the prize we sought is won;
The port is near, the bells I hear, the people all exulting,
While follow eyes the steady keel, the vessel grim and daring:

But O heart! heart! heart!

O the bleeding drops of red,

Where on the deck my Captain lies,

Fallen cold and dead.

 

O Captain! my Captain! rise up and hear the bells;
Rise up—for you the flag is flung—for you the bugle trills;
For you bouquets and ribbon’d wreaths—for you the shores a-crowding;
For you they call, the swaying mass, their eager faces turning;

Here Captain! dear father!

This arm beneath your head;

It is some dream that on the deck,

You’ve fallen cold and dead.

 

My Captain does not answer, his lips are pale and still;
My father does not feel my arm, he has no pulse nor will;
The ship is anchor’d safe and sound, its voyage closed and done;
From fearful trip, the victor ship, comes in with object won;

Exult, O shores, and ring, O bells!

But I, with mournful tread,

Walk the deck my Captain lies,

Fallen cold and dead.

 

When Gandhi was assassinated, Jawaharlal Nehru captured the mood of a mourning nation in his famous speech that begins: 'The light has gone out of our lives and there is darkness everywhere...'

 

 But the light shed by people like Lincoln, Gandhi and King never goes out. And I quote Nehru again from the same speech: 

'...The light has gone out, I said, and yet I was wrong. For the light that shone in this country was no ordinary light. The light that has illumined this country for these many years will illumine this country for many more years, and a thousand years later, that light will be seen in this country and the world will see it and it will give solace to innumerable hearts. For that light represented something more than the immediate past, it represented the living, the eternal truths, reminding us of the right path, drawing us from error, taking this ancient country to freedom...'

 

Lincoln, Gandhi and King, all fought for freedom, not just the freedom of countries, but freedom of nations. They fought to emancipate the wretched from suffering, and in the process, made the supreme sacrifice.

 

Please join me, those of you that agree, in saluting these brave men and other men and women of their ilk.

 

Permalink 
 14:51 | 13/Jan/2008 | 2 Comment(s)
Oliver Goldsmith : The Angelic Parrot

We had a guest for dinner last week. (I mean dinner as in an evening meal - not dinner as used by many to mean lunch). We talked about her cat, and my recent conversion into a vegan, and we landed on the topic of dogs. From there, somehow we landed on 'Elegy Written on the Death of a Mad Dog' by Goldsmith, a poem that I studied in fair detail way back at school.

 

Dr. Goldsmith (he was a medical doctor, an impoverished one when he was practising) is among my most favourite poets. He spoke like a parrot, but wrote like an angel, so goes his reputation. Look at how David Garrick mocked at him!!

 

Here lies Nolly Goldsmith, for shortness called Noll,
Who wrote like an angel, but talked like poor Poll.

 

Did he write like an angel? O, boy, sure he did. Between 1760 and his death, he produced the best of his works: his greatest poems: The Traveller and The Deserted Village; his two great plays: The Good Natured Man and She Stoops to Conquer; and his one unforgettable novel The Vicar of Wakefield. All these are classics in English Literature. I was particularly pleased when providence decided that my first place of work in England was Wakefield!!

 

Dr Goldsmith makes you think and think hard; he also makes you laugh. Lesser mortals would have perished under the considerable misfortune that he was privy to, before the Muse raised him to the pinnacles of glory. Apparently of extreme hideousness in a society that lays great store by physical charm and body language even today,  he wrote of his ugliness: 'An ugly man and a poor man is society only for himself, and such society the world lets me enjoy in great abundance...' Only genius can laugh and make others laugh in the light of such personal disadvantage.

 

Coming back to his poems, his Elegy is about a mad dog that bit a man in the town of Islington. The dog was friends with a man before a pique began, and the dog bit the man. There was consternation in the town that such a good man could be bitten by a dog, and the simple folk of Islington came to two conclusions: the dog was mad, and sadly, the man will die. The poem ends with an O.Henryish twist:

 

But soon a wonder came to light,

That showed the rogues they lied:

The man recovered from the bite,

The dog it was that died.

 

This is classic Goldsmith humour. Earlier in the poem, Goldsmith describes the unfortunate man who was bitten by the dog. Tongue in cheek, he writes:

 

A kind and gentle heart he had,

To comfort friends and foes;

The naked every day he clad,

When he put on his clothes.

 

There is humour and profundity spread across The Deserted Village. A poem of enduring value and a must in every anthology of significance, it describes the village of Auburn when the poet returns to it after years of wandering. He describes the village as '...loveliest village of the plain... and goes on :

 

How often have I loitered o'er thy green,
Where humble happiness endeared each scene!

 

and more, during the time after work:

 

While many a pastime circled in the shade,
The young contending as the old surveyed;

 

But when he returns from his travels, what does he find?

 

...These were thy charms - but all these charms are fled...

 

Why have the charms fled? Because, wealth has displaced simple lives, caused destruction and pain. Wealth, transient by nature in its existence, is however perennial in the devastation it causes:

 

...Ill fares the land, to hastening ills a prey,
Where wealth accumulates, and men decay:
Princes and lords may flourish, or may fade;
A breath can make them, as a breath has made;
But a bold peasantry, their country's pride,
When once destroyed, can never be supplied...

 

The poet, away though he was, and therefore spared of the process of decay, is still deeply affected; for he wanted to return to his village at the end of his wanderings:

 

...I still had hopes, my latest hours to crown,
Amidst these humble bowers to lay me down;
To husband out life's taper at the close, ...

 

...How happy he who crowns, in shades like these,
A youth of labour with an age of ease; ...

 

And then an exemplary simile:

 

...And, as a hare, whom hounds and horns pursue,
Pants to the place from whence at first she flew,
I still had hopes, my long vexations past,
Here to return - and die at home at last...

 

The two characters who are vividly described in the poem are the village preacher and the village school master. The preacher is profound, as a man of God is expected to be. He is a man of limited wants, and hence of unbounded happiness; look at how Goldsmith describes the surpassingly rich preacher: 

 

..A man he was to all the country dear,
And passing rich with forty pounds a year: ...

 

Forty pounds was not wealth, even in those days, but the preacher is rich!! He is rich because, he counts his riches not in pounds, but through the fulfilment of nobler ambition:

 

...Unpractised he to fawn, or seek for power,
By doctrines fashioned to the varying hour;
Far other aims his heart had learned to prize,
More skilled to raise the wretched than to rise...

 

He doesnot judge, for he is only a man of God; and as a true servant of God, he only serves:

 

...Careless their merits or their faults to scan,
His pity gave ere charity began.

Thus to relieve the wretched was his pride, ...

 

How does the preacher help the disadvantaged among his flock?

 

...And, as a bird each fond endearment tries
To tempt its new-fledged offspring to the skies,
He tried each art, reproved each dull delay,
Allured to brighter worlds, and led the way...

 

What about those that are sceptical of God and goodness that came to mock at him?

 

...Truth from his lips prevailed with double sway,
And fools who came to scoff, remained to pray...

 

But beyond his worldly calling, which he carries out with no compromise, his thoughts are all with Heaven - (the power of the simile again):

 

...Their welfare pleased him, and their cares distressed;
To them his heart, his love, his griefs were given,
But all his serious thoughts had rest in heaven.
As some tall cliff that lifts its awful form,
Swells from the vale, and midway leaves the storm,
Though round its breast the rolling clouds are spread,
Eternal sunshine settles on its head...

 

From sadness and seriousness, the poem meanders into frivolity and humour when Goldsmith describes the Village Schoolmaster:

 

...A man severe he was, and stern to view; ...

 

...Well had the boding tremblers learned to trace
The day's disasters in his morning face; ...

 

...Yet he was kind, or, if severe in aught,
The love he bore to learning was in fault...

 

The village school master reputedly (I would like to draw your attention to the words - the story ran) possesses several skills too:

 

...'Twas certain he could write, and cipher too;
Lands he could measure, terms and tides presage,
And even the story ran that he could gauge:...

 

And then the capping humorous lines:

 

...In arguing, too, the parson owned his skill,
For even though vanquished he could argue still;...


...And still they gazed, and still the wonder grew
That one small head could carry all he knew,...

 Thereafter, in the poem, we see the stern Dr Goldsmith. He brings in picture after picture in striking contrast, of life as it should have been, and life as it has become. :

 

...Where village statesmen talked with looks profound,
And news much older than their ale went round.
Imagination fondly stoops to trace
The parlour splendours of that festive place:... 

 

He is unsparing in his criticism of those whose wealth has destroyed the simple happiness of honest folk, and boldly announces where his sympathies lie:

 

...To me more dear, congenial to my heart,
One native charm, than all the gloss of art....
 

 ...And, e'en while fashion's brightest arts decoy,
The heart, distrusting, asks if this be joy....

 

...how wide the limits stand
Between a splendid and a happy land...

 

He is not fooled by the trappings of pelf and power. He clearly foresees what will happen to a people that forget their roots and warns the rich usurpers:

 

...This wealth is but a name
That leaves our useful products still the same.
Not so the loss. The man of wealth and pride
Takes up a space that many poor supplied;...

 

...As some fair female, unadorned and plain
Secure to please while youth confirms her reign,
Slights every borrowed charm that dress supplies,...

 

...for charms are frail,
When time advances, and when lovers fail,
She then shines forth, solicitous to bless,
In all the glaring impotence of dress: ...

 

...Thus fares the land, by luxury betrayed;
In nature's simplest charms at first arrayed:
But verging to decline, its splendours rise,
Its vistas strike, its palaces surprise; ...

 

...The country blooms - a garden, and a grave....

 

A man who has spent a considerable part of his life in poverty and misery, spurns the call of luxury, for he perceives luxury as the cause of misery.

 

...O, luxury! thou curst by Heaven's decree,
How ill exchanged are things like these for thee!
How do thy potions, with insidious joy,
Diffuse their pleasures only to destroy! ...

 

But all hope is not lost. The final victory is still with the faithful. He calls for reinforcements from his only source of aid, his one true and powerful friend, Poetry, to rescue the situation:

 

...And thou. sweet Poetry, thou loveliest maid,
Still first to fly where sensual joys invade;

 

... let thy voice, prevailing over time,
Redress the rigors of the inclement clime;
Aid slighted truth with thy persuasive strain;
Teach erring man to spurn the rage of gain;

 

...That trade's proud empire hastes to swift decay,
As ocean sweeps the laboured mole away;
While self-dependent power can time defy,
As rocks resist the billows and the sky...

 

Can anyone have doubts about the angelic qualities of Goldsmith's writing?

 

The Traveller is another scintillating piece of poetry. I will, but quote a few stanzas and leave you to savour the glory that is Goldsmith:

 

...Such is the patriot's boast where'er we roam,

His first, best country, ever is at home.

And yet, perhaps, if countries we compare,

And estimate the blessings which they share,

Though patriots flatter, still shall wisdom find

An equal portion dealt to all mankind;... 

 

...Wealth, commerce, honour, liberty, content.

Yet these each other's power so strong contest,

That either seems destructive of the rest.

Where wealth and freedom reign, contentment fails,

And honour sinks where commerce long prevails...


 

...In florid beauty groves and fields appear,

Man seems the only growth that dwindles here.

Contrasted faults through all his manners reign: